Skip to main content
Built for UK solicitors

Intelligence
meets Justice

The first AI built for the SRA Code, not against it. Triages new matters, drafts the first version, finds the precedent, and keeps a tamper-evident record of every decision — so the solicitor signs off, not the AI.

Request beta access

Five-firm closed beta · Free until 1 September 2026 · SRA-aligned audit trail

Built with input from UK solicitors·Azure UK South·Solicitor-supervised by design

100%

Solicitor-supervised — every AI action

0

AI retention — your matters never train an AI

6yrs

Audit retention — SRA-aligned, COLP-ready

30yr

Find Case Law judgment index (Phase 2)

What only LawFuze does

Six gaps in the legal-AI market.
We’re built inside each one.

The legal-AI market splits three ways. Here’s what each of them misses.

0specific gaps no competitor closes
0UK-only domain, no US data transfer
0compromises on supervisor sign-off

01/06

Your data stays in the UK.

Every matter lives in Microsoft Azure UK South. The COLP can prove it never left.

  • Azure UK South region only
  • ICO controller ZC147676
  • Zero US data transfer, zero cross-border hops
DATA PATH · LIVE--:--:-- BST
0 cross-border events todayUK South region only

What competitors doUS tools offer EU residency at best. UK practice management runs on shared US/UK clouds.

02/06

The supervising solicitor signs off — not the AI.

Every AI output runs draft → solicitor → supervisor → client. The SRA roll number lands on the audit row.

  • State-machine workflow, no shortcuts
  • Supervisor SRA roll on every audit entry
  • Append-only log, 6-year SRA retention
APPROVAL QUEUELogged · entry #4821
supervisor_signoff · SRA 123456721 May 14:02

What competitors doOther tools treat the lawyer as a single user. None bake supervisor sign-off into the workflow.

03/06

UK case law from the government-sanctioned source.

Pending a Computational Analysis Licence from The National Archives to process England & Wales judgments at scale. Hard rules enforced in code, not in marketing.

  • Find Case Law (The National Archives) — the official source
  • 25-word quotation cap enforced post-generation
  • 24-hour daily reconciliation with TNA (new + revised + withdrawn)
CITATION VERIFIERFind Case Law · TNA
>
caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.ukCAL · LawFuze-Ingest/1.0

What competitors doFree indexes are unofficial mirrors. US tools are US-only. Pan-European tools treat UK case law as an afterthought.

04/06

Deadlines with the rule number attached.

An agent reads your matter, identifies the applicable CPR / FPR / Criminal Procedure Rule, and writes the invite with the rule citation in the body.

  • Per-matter generative — not static templates
  • Cited rule number in every calendar invite
  • Defence-grade for missed-deadline disputes
DEADLINE · MATTER QUEUEMay 2026
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
Disclosure · Smith v Smith
CITED RULE
14 days from service of allocation
verify · justice.gov.uksupervising solicitor signs off

What competitors doUK practice management ships static templates. Word add-ins don't model deadlines. Generic calendars carry no rule citation.

05/06

Priced for UK firms — not AmLaw 100.

£499/month for a five-fee-earner firm. The mid-market the £20k+ tools won't serve.

  • Firm Starter £499/mo · 5 seats included
  • Solo £149/mo for self-employed solicitors
  • 30% founding-firm discount locked 12 months
PRICING · SAME FIRM SIZE5 fee earners
US biglaw tools
won't quote · 20-seat min
LawFuze Firm Starter ★
£499/mo
Word add-ins
£75/seat × 5
SAVE£0/ year vs US biglaw
30% founding-firm discount · locked 12 monthsno card on file in beta

What competitors doUS biglaw needs 20+ seats at £20k+/year. UK enterprise-AI is custom-quoted. Word add-ins solve one slice.

06/06

The AI that answers to the SRA. Not OpenAI.

Every other legal AI runs your matter through an AI whose terms quietly reserve the right to keep your data. LawFuze pins the AI to the SRA Code itself — confidential by design, supervised by default, and built so the vendor never gets to train on what you're working on.

  • SRA 6.3 — confidentiality built into every AI call
  • SRA 7.1 — the AI refuses when the sources don't support an answer
  • Your matters never train a third-party AI
SRA-BOUNDData never trained on
Generic legal AI
Vendor TOS reserves re-use rights
Logs prompt content for training
No professional obligations
LawFuze
SRA 6.3· confidentiality built into every call
SRA 7.1· refuses when uncertain
SRA 4.1· every output supervised and logged
Solicitor's code binds the AI. The vendor's TOS doesn't bind your firm.

What competitors doGeneric AI terms-of-service reserve broad re-use rights for 'service improvement'. The vendor isn't bound by your professional code — you are. LawFuze bridges the gap so the AI is too.

All of it. Without ever leaving the UK.

Five firms invited. Free until 1 September 2026. The founders answer the email.

What sets LawFuze apart

The work no solicitor has time to do — and it proves every step to the SRA.

LawFuze reads the whole file, computes the numbers that matter by rule not by guess, and verifies every authority before it leaves the building. You stay accountable; the AI assists, and every decision is auditable.

Every authority verified before it leaves

Every case and statute in a draft is resolved against The National Archives and legislation.gov.uk. An authority that resolves to nothing real is blocked before it can leave the building — the rest flagged for your sign-off. The post-Ayinde duty, enforced on every draft.

Deadlines computed to the day

Limitation and court deadlines are worked out by fixed legal rules — not estimated — and re-checked the moment a new fact lands on the file. Impossible to silently miss.

Every AI step logged and signed off

Each significant automated decision is recorded in a tamper-proof DUAA 2025 s.80 log — the inputs, the output, the lawful basis, and the named solicitor who signed it off. Your audit trail writes itself.

The whole file read — the gap surfaced, never invented

From source-of-funds reconstruction to disclosure review, LawFuze reads the entire file and pins every figure and clause to its source document. It surfaces the gap a tired human skims past — it never makes one up.

Fixed rules where money is at stake

SDLT, limitation, IHT relief and quantum are calculated by fixed, traceable rules. Every number traces back to a rule and a source — no guesswork on the figures that matter.

Privilege checked before anything reaches AI

Before a single line of firm data reaches any AI, it's checked for legal professional privilege and personal data — and recorded in an AI usage log the COLP can search. The firm can prove, on demand, every time client data touched AI, what it held, and the named fee-earner. The outgoing text is never stored — only a fingerprint of it.

The human stays in charge

Specialist positions hard-stop to partner sign-off. Capacity prompts never label a client. SARs are never auto-filed. The AI does the work; the solicitor makes the call — always.

Citations checked before exportPrivilege checked before AIDUAA 2025 s.80 decision logUK-hosted · never used to train AIFixed rules, not guessworkA solicitor accountable on every resultEvery matter walled off · DPIA-backed

The tools behind it · one accountable workspace

Verify & audit

  • Citation checks
  • Privilege protection
  • AI usage log
  • AI decision log

Deadlines & money

  • Employment tribunal deadlines
  • Inheritance tax calculator
  • SDLT calculator
  • Schedules

Risk & conduct

  • Regulatory deadlines
  • Conflict checks
  • Source of funds
  • Capacity & vulnerability

Litigation & property

  • Opponent analysis
  • Document insights
  • Building Safety Act
  • Certificate of Title

The 60-minute intake

24 days → 60 minutes.

A new client at a typical UK firm takes 24 days from first contact to billable work — most of it admin, all of it regulated. LawFuze runs the whole sequence in one supervised AI flow. 20 minutes of fee-earner time, end-to-end.

  1. 14 min

    Conversational triage

    The prospect tells the AI what happened. Multi-turn, refuses legal advice, classifies practice area, identifies parties, estimates fee band.

    DUAA 2025 s.80 — notice + contest baked in

  2. 21 min

    Conflict check

    Fuzzy + phonetic name match + Companies House director/PSC traversal. <30 seconds. Anything below 90% confidence routes to COLP.

    SRA Code 6.1–6.3 — duty to act in client's best interest

  3. 36 min

    ID + biometrics — at launch

    Client photographs their passport + a selfie on their phone. eIDV (Onfido via Thirdfort) — coming at public launch; PG81 Safe-Harbour aligned.

    MLR 2017 reg.28 — customer due diligence

  4. 46 min

    Source of funds — at launch

    Open Banking one-tap consent — statements reviewed, narrative drafted, lawyer approves. Coming at public launch.

    MLR 2017 reg.28(11) — source of funds verification

  5. 51 min

    Engagement letter

    Vetted template by matter type, fee structure, costs estimate. DocuSign Connect e-signature in the same flow.

    SRA Code 8.6 + 8.7 — costs information + plain English

  6. 62 min

    Money on account

    Client pays into the firm's segregated client account at ClearBank — a Rule 3 bank, not an EMI. Three-way reconciled automatically.

    SRA Accounts Rules 3, 5, 8 — client money

  7. 7instant

    Matter is live

    First three tasks seeded from your firm's workflow template. Client gets portal credentials. Welcome pack sent. Named supervising solicitor stamped.

    Garfield.Law pattern — named accountable solicitor

1 of 7 playing

The Ayinde defence

AI that holds up in the High Court.

Ayinde v Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin) made hallucinated authorities a referable SRA matter. We built three defences directly into the platform so every output a LawFuze AI produces is defensible before any tribunal.

Citation verifierlive

Every authority, green-tick verified.

Smith v Smith [2024] EWCA Civ 442
Jones v Khan [2019] EWHC 1782 (Comm)

Live fetch against Find Case Law and legislation.gov.uk. If a source can't be verified, the AI refuses to cite it.

Supervising solicitorrequired

One name on every AI output.

PS

Priya Shah

Reviewed · 14:32

Every AI output is stamped with the regulated solicitor whose name carries it. No anonymous outputs leave the firm.

Audit trailimmutable

Every prompt, response, refusal.

  1. 14:31:08prompt

    Draft position statement on conduct

  2. 14:31:24response

    AI draft generated · 3 citations

  3. 14:31:24verify

    Citations green-tick passed

  4. 14:32:01review

    Priya Shah · approved · note added

Append-only, tamper-proof log. Replay any AI decision end-to-end during a regulator audit.

The same pattern the SRA authorised Garfield.Law on (May 2025): named accountable solicitor on every AI step, refusal-first AI behaviour, citations grounded in verifiable sources. Read the methodology.

Compliance lives in the background

July is just July. No fire-drill.

35% of UK compliance officers describe their AML workload as “overwhelming.” The annual SRA questionnaire takes ~80 hours of partner time. LawFuze runs both COLP and COFA loops continuously, so the year-end becomes a sign-off, not a re-construction.

Compliance Officer · Legal Practice

COLP dashboard

DSR queue14open
Supervisor review23pending
Regulator radar41unread
CDD refresh due9matters
Complaints (48h SLA)2overdue

Every flagged AI output lands in your queue with the named supervising solicitor pre-filled. The PII renewal pack, lateral- hire conflict check, weekly regulator digests, ongoing CDD schedule (MLR 2017 reg 27) and SRA 8.3-8.4 complaints register are all auto-prepared from your own records.

Compliance Officer · Finance & Admin

COFA dashboard

Reconciliation7overdue
Residual balances > 12 mo11open
Billing audit5pending
Time-audit health88/100

Three-way client-account reconciliation runs daily, not every-5-weeks. Residual balances surface at the 12-month line per SAR 5.1. Client account at ClearBank — never an EMI. The pre-bill time audit (CPR 47) catches vague narratives and round-hour billing before the bill goes out.

Mirrors SRA Authorisation Rule 8.5 (COLP) and the Solicitors Accounts Rules 3 / 5 / 8 (COFA). See the full compliance suite.

Beta access

Free for the first five firms

Phase 1 of LawFuze is a closed solicitor beta running until our public launch on 1 September 2026. We're inviting five UK solicitors to use the platform free of charge while we earn the certifications, licences and insurance that public launch requires.

Closed beta · Free
  • No card. No subscription. No usage charges.
  • 14-day cancellation right. Export and erase your data at any time under UK GDPR.
  • Paid tiers (Solo · Firm · Premium) launch alongside Stripe on 1 September 2026.
  • Founding-firm pricing locked for 12 months from public launch for beta participants.

Five invited beta seats only. Paid plans, Stripe billing and VAT invoicing go live on 1 September 2026.

Take the admin
off your desk

Five UK solicitors are joining the closed beta — free until 1 September 2026. Founding-firm pricing locks for 12 months from public launch.

Request beta access
AI Disclaimer

LawFuze provides AI tools that support qualified legal professionals with research and drafting. AI outputs are not legal advice. Every AI output carries a confidence indicator and source citations, and must be reviewed by a qualified solicitor before reliance. The supervising solicitor — not the AI — remains responsible to the client under the SRA Code of Conduct.

Regulatory Notice

LawFuze is a technology platform and is not a law firm. We do not provide legal advice or legal services. Solicitors using LawFuze remain individually responsible for compliance with the SRA Standards and Regulations and the SRA Code of Conduct. Use of AI tools does not diminish a solicitor's duty to their clients or professional obligations.

Data Protection

LawFuze processes personal data in accordance with the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018. Customer data is stored in the UK on Microsoft Azure (UK South region). AI inference uses named sub-processors in the EU and US; where data flows outside the UK/EEA we rely on ICO International Data Transfer Agreements (IDTAs) supported by published Transfer Risk Assessments — treat IDTA execution as an in-progress control until each is signed and filed. The current sub-processor list and IDTA status of each is published on our sub-processor register. For data subject rights including access, rectification, erasure, and portability, contact legal@lawfuze.com.

Security & Compliance Roadmap
ICO controller registration· LiveUK GDPR aligned· LiveDPIA + ROPA published· Livelegislation.gov.uk + TNA Find Case Law (OGL v3.0, read use)· LiveCyber Essentials Plus· In progressComputational Analysis Licence (case law AI/search index use)· In progressPII / Cyber / D&O insurance· In progressISO 27001· On roadmapSOC 2 Type II· On roadmap

Certifications in progress or on the roadmap are not current attestations. We publish certificate references only once an accredited body has issued them.

© 2026 LawFuze Ltd. All rights reserved.

Registered in England & Wales • Company No. 16800372 • Registered Office: 4 Enriqueta Rylands Close, Stretford, Manchester, M32 0NW

Founded by Sake Nagarjuna Naidu — built in Manchester for UK solicitors.

ICO controller registration ZC147676 (14 May 2026 — 13 May 2027) — listed on the Trust Center. VAT registration in progress; reference will be added on receipt.

Data Protection Officer: dpo@lawfuze.com · Security: security@lawfuze.com · Complaints: /complaints